Dr Karl Shuker's Official Website - http://www.karlshuker.com/index.htm

IMPORTANT:
To view a complete, regularly-updated listing of my Shuker In MovieLand blog's articles (each one instantly clickable), please click HERE!

IMPORTANT:

To view a complete, regularly-updated listing of my ShukerNature blog's articles (each one instantly clickable), please click HERE!

IMPORTANT:
To view a complete, regularly-updated listing of my RebelBikerDude's AI Biker Art's thematic text & picture galleties (each one instantly clickable), please click HERE!

IMPORTANT:
To view a complete, regularly-updated listing of my Starsteeds blog's poetry and other lyrical writings (each one instantly clickable), please click HERE!

IMPORTANT:
To view a complete, regularly-updated listing of my Eclectarium blog's articles (each one instantly clickable), please click HERE!


Search This Blog


Showing posts with label Angelina Jolie. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Angelina Jolie. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 19, 2022

COME AWAY

 
Publicity poster for Come Away (© Brenda Chapman/Endurance Media/Fred Films/Yoruba Saxon Productions/Signature Entertainment/Relativity Media – reproduced here on a strictly non-commercial Fair Use basis for educational/review purposes only).

The movie that I watched during the afternoon of 2 October 2022 promised so much, but, sadly, it failed to deliver for me.

Directed by Brenda Chapman (in her live-action directorial debut), and released in 2020 by Signature Entertainment (in the UK) and Relativity Media (in the USA), it was the fantasy(?) movie Come Away. In it, the classic children's stories of Peter Pan by J.M. Barrie and Alice's Adventures In Wonderland by Lewis Carroll were not only reimagined but melded together.

This was achieved via the nothing if not original construct of having Peter and Alice as siblings (together with a slightly older brother, David, whose tragic demise sets the scene for much darkness and introspection), plus kindly if impoverished parents Jack and Rose Littleton, played by David Oyelowo (excellent) and Angelina Jolie (stick to Maleficent!).

Also on hand are a well-meaning yet ruthless aunt (Anna Chancellor), a deranged grandfather in hyperactive Mad Hatter mode (Clarke Peters), and not forgetting a couple of so brief as to be scarcely noticeable and entirely forgettable cameo performances by Michael Caine and Derek Jacobi. The children are all very imaginative, especially Peter (Jordan Anthony) whose derring-do alter ego pretend-character is of course a Peter Pan precursor, whereas Alice (Keira Chansa) reveals a particular liking for pretend tea parties with her white rabbit toy and others as attendees.

Their play fantasies are visualised beautifully on-screen, but that is all that they appear to be, fantasies, with a very real, grim mainstream plot taking centre-stage (one in which David's death leads to their father falling back into his earlier gambling ways and their mother resorting to alcohol to ease her pain) – until the final climactic scene, that is.

Then, out of nowhere, after tracking down their evil moneylender uncle Captain James aka CJ (David Gyasi) in his underground 19th-Century London lair after he'd had their father Jack maimed for failing to repay a gambling debt, Peter and a befriended gang of London street urchins called the Lost Boys, together with Captain James and his villainous henchmen, all abruptly transform – into Peter Pan and the Lost Boys battling Captain Hook and his pirate band aboard a galleon far far away!

As in the original Barrie novel, Peter wins, chopping off Captain James's/Hook's hand and throwing it to the very much alive crocodile who only moments earlier had been a very dead taxiderm specimen mounted on the wall of Captain James's subterranean London abode. Then off Peter and the Lost Boys fly through the sky on their galleon headed for Never Land!

Moreover, the movie ends with a secret visit to his former family home by Peter, leaving behind a pile of gold coins for his parents before disappearing back to Never Land without giving them the chance to see him.

In short, what had hitherto been a straightforward non-fiction plot, with fantasy scenes limited to expressions of the children's imagination, abruptly and inexplicably transforms into a wholesale fantasy – a transformation that makes no sense whatsoever. How can Peter's disappearance be explained in real terms, especially as his family seems entirely unconcerned by it? And if their wicked uncle, who'd maimed his own brother over a mere gambling debt, had really had his own hand chopped off by young Peter, I dread to think how violent his revenge on the family would have been. Yet, nothing, they all apparently lived happily ever after.

It's almost as if the ending from an entirely different, fantasy-based Peter Pan-themed film had accidentally been tagged onto this film, instead of its own expected non-fiction one. Bizarre.

Indeed, by making no sense whatsoever, this fatuous albeit visually spectacular finale spoilt the entire movie for me, albeit one that until then had at times proven rather too effective at tugging upon my emotions by reviving so many memories of my own long-gone happy childhood and loving family.

As for this movie's title, Come Away, it is taken from a famous poem by Irish writer W.B. Yeats, entitled 'Stolen Child' (click here for a suitably spellbinding musical setting of his words by Loreena McKennitt), which is all about a human child induced by fairies to come away with them to their enchanted land, leaving behind the human world forever. At the film's beginning and ending, an adult Alice (Gugu Mbatha-Raw) is reading this poem to her children (who just so happen to be called Wendy, John, and Michael – the three children befriended by the title character in the original novel Peter Pan), but it has precious direct relevance to the movie's plot. True, Peter does ultimately abandon the real world and even his family for the enchanted realm of Never Land, but he does so entirely of his own free will, he is not lured away by supernatural entities, or anyone else for that matter.

All in all, Come Away is a decidedly unconnected, unconvincing, and ultimately unsatisfying movie as far as I'm concerned – except for the exquisitely-portrayed fantasy scenes, which are truly a beautiful sight to behold, however relevant or otherwise they each may be to the overall storyline.

If you'd like to catch a glimpse of what to expect, click here to watch an official Come Away trailer on YouTube.

To view a complete chronological listing of all of my Shuker In MovieLand blog's other film reviews and articles (each one instantly accessible via a direct clickable link), please click HERE, and please click HERE to view a complete fully-clickable alphabetical listing of them.

 

Friday, May 21, 2021

MALEFICENT

 
Publicity poster for Maleficent (© Robert Stromberg/Walt Disney Pictures/Roth Films/Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures – reproduced here on a strictly non-commercial Fair Use basis for educational/review purposes only)

Many months previously, knowing that I've always been a massive Disney fan, a friend lent me her DVD of the movie Maleficent, which on 7 April 2017 I finally got around to watching. It's the Disney live-action reworking of their sumptuous animated feature film Sleeping Beauty, released in 1959 and based upon the classic Charles Perrault fairy tale 'La Belle au Bois Dormant'.

A dark fantasy film directed by Robert Stromberg, and released by Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures in 2014, Maleficent provides a back story for the eponymous wicked fairy that is wholly original in every sense! For according to this retelling, Maleficent is evil only because she had previously been grievously betrayed by her human lover – none other than the youth who would in time become King Stefan (father of the future Sleeping Beauty, Princess Aurora), who cuts off her wings while she is asleep (a controversial scene that has been interpreted in a number of different ways…).

Consequently, Maleficent is actually misused and misunderstood rather than malevolent. Yeah, right! Also, if she really did begin as a sweet, pure-hearted child and maiden, I cannot help but wonder why she had been given the name Maleficent, bearing in mind that it is derived from the Latin for 'evil-doer'…

The special effects in Maleficent are breathtakingly spectacular, as you would both imagine and expect from Disney's CGI department. However, there is only so much reworking possible with anything, and I'm sorry but in the original Perrault fairytale (in which she is called Carabosse), and especially in Disney's original animated film, which I have viewed many times down through the years from childhood onwards, Maleficent is the absolute embodiment of evil. There is not a glimmer, not the slightest scintilla, of goodness in her. Consequently, for me it was impossible to suspend disbelief and pretend that she's really not that bad after all.

Equally, as Stefan, albeit little more than a cipher in the original movie, was a good, noble character there, his wholesale conversion here into an actively malicious, black-hearted, deceitful betrayer of a young, innocent Maleficent is just too implausible, too unrealistic a transformation for me to countenance. Bending the rules is one thing, but snapping them in two and then shattering them into a myriad of shards is something else entirely, yet the latter action is, I feel, the more accurate description of this extensively-manipulated storyline's modus operandi. A sequel movie, Maleficent: Mistress of Evil, was released in 2019, but I haven't watched it so far, partly because I dread to think what further liberties with the original fairytale may have been taken in it.

Having said all of that, Maleficent is an enjoyable romp (which is why I later purchased it myself in DVD format), with a perfectly-cast Angelina Jolie portraying the title character superbly, especially in her more sinister scenes, and showcased throughout by wonderfully rich, lavish visuals. It also includes a most unexpected (albeit imho entirely nonsensical) twist upon who actually wakes Sleeping Beauty (played by Elle Fanning) with true love's kiss. The phrase "Yeah, right!" readily comes to mind yet again.

Interestingly, Princess Aurora as a child is played by none other than Jolie's own daughter, Vivienne Jolie-Pitt, having been chosen to ensure that she would not be frightened by Jolie in her role as Maleficent. And Kristen 'Twilight' Stewart had been considered for the role of the adult Aurora. Indeed, during casting for this movie, a fair few famous names came and went. For instance, the adult King Stefan is played by Sharlto Copley, but Jude Law had earlier been considered for this role, just as Judi Dench and Emma Thompson had been considered to play two of the three good fairies.

In addition, former Doctor Who actor Peter Capaldi had actually been cast and filmed in the role of Maleficent's uncle, King Kinloch, the fairy monarch of the Moors, but his scenes were cut from the movie's final version, as were those of Miranda Richardson, playing Queen Ulla, Maleficent's aunt and Kinloch's consort.

Oh yes, almost forgot: a beautiful Tchaikovsky-based song ('Once Upon A Dream', created from the Grand Waltz in the Russian composer's immortal ballet Sleeping Beauty) and the vocals of Lana Del Rey really don't go together, honestly – just sayin'...

Anyway, if you haven't seen the movie, click here to view an eye-popping trailer for Maleficent.

And to view a complete listing of all of my Shuker In MovieLand blog's other film reviews and articles (each one instantly accessible via a direct clickable link), please click HERE! 

A meeting with Maleficent! (© Dr Karl Shuker)