Dr Karl Shuker's Official Website - http://www.karlshuker.com/index.htm

IMPORTANT:
To view a complete, regularly-updated listing of my Shuker In MovieLand blog's articles (each one instantly clickable), please click HERE!

IMPORTANT:

To view a complete, regularly-updated listing of my ShukerNature blog's articles (each one instantly clickable), please click HERE!

IMPORTANT:
To view a complete, regularly-updated listing of my Shuker's Literary Likings blog's articles (each one instantly clickable), please click HERE!

IMPORTANT:
To view a complete, regularly-updated listing of my Starsteeds blog's poetry and other lyrical writings (each one instantly clickable), please click HERE!

IMPORTANT:
To view a complete, regularly-updated listing of my Eclectarium blog's articles (each one instantly clickable), please click HERE!


Search This Blog

Monday, May 30, 2022

THE SIN EATER (aka THE ORDER)

 
My official UK DVD of The Sin Eater (© Brian Helgeland/20th Century Fox – reproduced here on a strictly non-commercial Fair Use basis for educational/review purposes only)

The things that you learn from movies! Until I watched this present film on 8 May 2022, I was totally unaware of the extraordinary concept of sin eaters and the corresponding practice of sin-eating – the sin eater being a person who ritually eats a meal that has symbolically absorbed the sins of a recently-deceased person, and is thereby deemed to be carrying the sins of that person. Sin eaters who perform such rituals on a regular basis are thus believed to carry all of the sins of all of those recently-deceased persons, and as a consequence are generally feared and shunned by other people. From what I have since read about this fascinating religious folk-belief, it was formerly particularly prevalent in Wales and English/Welsh border counties, but in the fantasy/horror film under review here it is presented as a heretical practice in Roman Catholicism, and the film itself is set in Rome.

Directed, co-produced, and written by Brian Helgeland, and released by 20th Century Fox in 2003, The Sin Eater (aka The Order) significantly extends the sin eater concept, via this movie's central premise that a person can actually circumvent the normal manner of ensuring that their soul goes to Heaven upon death (i.e. by living a good, sinless life). Instead, they can lead an evil, sinful life, but upon the point of death they then have all of their sins absorbed – literally eaten – by someone else, the appointed sin eater, after which they reach Heaven with a pure, sin-absolved soul, with the sin eater carrying the foul essence of their evil within himself instead.

The greatly-missed Heath Ledger, one of my favourite actors, stars in The Sin Eater as Father Alex Bernier, a member of the fictitious Carolingian Order of Roman Catholic priests whose speciality is confronting and overcoming evil supernatural entities on the Church's bidding. Alex is already questioning his own faith when he receives unexpected, highly disturbing news – Father Dominic (Francesco Carnelutti), his mentor and the Carolingian Order's head, has been found dead inside his Rome domicile. Moreover, his death is deemed suspicious, both by the police and (particularly) by the Church – so much so, in fact, that Alex is swiftly dispatched to Rome to investigate the incident by the eminent figure of Cardinal Driscoll (Peter Weller), a favourite to become the next Pope.

After arriving and examining Dominic's corpse at the morgue, Alex discovers strange markings upon it, which, when assisted in his investigations by fellow Carolingian priest and longstanding friend Father Thomas Garrett (Mark Addy), are revealed to be the signs that a sin eater places there during a sin-eating ritual. They also discover from his personal archive of ancient books and esoteric manuscripts that Dominic had been extensively involved in researching arcane, forbidden lore, which had ultimately led to his being ex-communicated by the Catholic Church.

After Cardinal Driscoll is informed of their findings, he personally visits Alex and Thomas in Rome, in order to present them with a sacred silver dagger specifically used for killing sin eaters when wielded while chanting an Aramaic incantation; once again they had learned all of this from Dominic's occult library.

So what happens now? SPOILER ALERT!! If you don't want to know, read no further!

To cut a very complex, convoluted story short (or relatively so!): Alex and Thomas visit a sinister masked figure dubbed the Black Pope holding court in hidden catacomb-like chambers beneath a night club, who extracts the information that they require, if they are to succeed in locating the sin eater, by the singularly diabolical method of hanging three captive prisoners there and listening to their last utterances before they die (the disconcerting notion being that those about to meet their deaths are privy to cryptic information not available to the living). When Alex and Thomas attempt to leave the Black Pope's obscene den of iniquity following this unholy, accursed ceremony, however, Thomas is attacked by a demon, but is rescued by Alex.

While Thomas recuperates in hospital, Alex finally tracks down and meets the sin eater – a young-looking man named William Eden (Benno Fürmann). In reality, however, Eden turns out to be several centuries old, his sin-eating activities having bestowed perpetual youth upon him ever since he willingly became a sin eater in the late 1500s, when still only a child, in order to ensure that the soul of his beloved older brother, a good man who had just been killed in an accident during the construction of the great dome of St Peter's basilica, would go to Heaven; a priest had vindictively excommunicated him some time previously for having mercifully saved the life of a prostitute.

Eden also informs Alex that Dominic had been dying and had therefore purposefully requested him to perform a sin-eating ritual, in order to cancel out the sins polluting Dominic's soul from his dabbling in the dark arts and other heretical activities that had earned his excommunication by the Church.

Now, however, Eden has grown tired of sin-eating, and weary of life itself, fervently seeking release, desiring his own death at long last, after attending and administering his soul-cleansing powers to those of so many persons down through the countless years, all of whom, with the sole exception of his brother, had been evil and did not deserve a route to Heaven but had paid him well to provide them with one. Eden pleads with Alex to stab him with the dagger as Alex had intended, thereby releasing Eden's own soul and freeing it at last from the heavy burden of sins absorbed from those of others – but Alex finds himself unable to do the necessary deed. However, he gains first-hand knowledge of what the sin-eating ritual entails, by assisting Eden as he performs it upon yet another dying person who has sought his services (and who like the numerous others before him is willing to pay him handsomely for them), another lifelong sinner anxious to rid his soul of the wickedness that it has accrued.

Afterwards, Alex departs, leaving a desperate Eden behind. So Eden murders a young woman, Mara (Shannyn Sossamon), with whom Alex has fallen in love and is planning to quit the priesthood to be with, but he makes it look as if she has committed suicide by slitting her wrists, then leaves her body to be found by a distraught Alex. As suicide is deemed a mortal sin by the Church, Alex conducts the sin-eating ritual upon Mara's newly-deceased body, so that her soul can enter Heaven – only to discover to his horror that none of the sins that he absorbs from her include the sin of suicide. Alex then realizes that Eden has murdered her, in order to goad Alex into taking revenge by killing him in return, which is exactly what Eden so eagerly craves, an end to his hitherto endless life.

Nevertheless, when Alex tracks Eden down again, his all-consuming desire to avenge Mara is too great to be denied, as is needed if he is to thwart Eden's plan, So Alex duly stabs him with the silver dagger while reading out the Aramaic incantation. Crucially, however, what Alex and Thomas had failed to discover while researching sin-eating was that when a sin eater is stabbed to death, all of his sin-eating powers and all of the sins that he has absorbed down through his immensely-extended life as a sin eater are directly transferred to whoever has killed him, transforming his killer into his replacement – i.e. becoming a new sin eater. So this is precisely what happens to Alex when he kills Eden. Eden is dead, but Alex is now a sin eater in his place, containing all of the sins that Eden had previously contained.

One other shattering discovery is also made – the identity of the evil Black Pope figure, who is exposed as being none other than Cardinal Driscoll! Alex swiftly makes this devastating fact public, instantly destroying Driscoll's entire career in the Church, let alone his chances of becoming Pope. Consequently, Driscoll chooses to commit suicide, and just before the point of death he commands Alex as the new sin eater to absorb all of his previous vile, foul sins, as well as his final sin of suicide, so that his absolved soul can go to Heaven – but Alex refuses. Instead of eating the ritual wafer containing Driscoll's host of absorbed sins, Alex rams it down Driscoll's throat, choking him, and thus condemning the soul of the terrified Cardinal to eternal infernal damnation.

The movie ends with Alex vowing to become a very different sin eater from his predecessor, Eden. Instead of absorbing the sins of evildoers and being paid very handsomely by them in return for his soul-purging actions (as Eden was), he will only perform the sin-eating ritual upon those who have led good lives but have been unjustly condemned by the Church, like Eden's brother had been.

The above summary is a greatly-simplified retelling of the storyline for The Sin Eater, whose many twists and turns kept me thoroughly engrossed throughout. Interestingly, neither Heath Ledger nor Benno Fürmann were the first choices to play their respective roles (Antonio Banderas and Vincent Cassel were). However, Ledger's performance as the disillusioned, unhappy priest Alex is riveting and Fürmann bestows upon his enigmatic sin eater Eden a captivating combination of serpentine charisma and genuine pathos. Moreover, the sickening acts perpetrated within the Black Pope's depraved subterranean realm are truly horrific.

Yet for me, the most chilling component of this fantasy/horror movie takes the form of two small children, a boy and a girl, who are first seen squatting on the floor just outside the main door of Dominic's dwelling at the beginning of the movie. These 'children' are playing a game on the ground in a lethargic, desultory manner, their heads slouched down, but when Dominic arrives they look up at him, revealing grey, otherworldly faces and black eyes that radiate palpable evil!

They are still there when Alex arrives after learning of Dominic's death, and he wonders out loud who – or what – spawned them, evidently suspecting them to be directly related to Dominic's occult experiments. Not long afterwards, moreover, he receives an affirmative response to his query when he encounters them again, this time at night in a graveyard, whereupon they transform into demonic entities who seek to attack him, but are warded off when he wields his crucifix in their direction.

Nor is that momentous event these terrifying twins' final appearance – but I'll leave you to discover that for yourself, if you watch this very engrossing and highly unusual, original movie, which I definitely recommend that you do.

To pay a brief visit to the unsettling but fascinating netherworld of The Sin Eater, be sure to click here in order to watch an official trailer for this macabre yet mesmerizing movie on YouTube.

To view a complete chronological listing of all of my Shuker In MovieLand blog's other film reviews and articles (each one instantly accessible via a direct clickable link), please click HERE, and please click HERE to view a complete fully-clickable alphabetical listing of them.

 

Thursday, May 26, 2022

MUNE: GUARDIAN OF THE MOON

 
Publicity poster for Mune: Guardian of the Moon © Alexandre Heboyan/Benoît Philippon/On Animation Studios/Onyx Films/Kinology/Orange Studio/Paramount Pictures/GKIDS/Universal Pictures – reproduced here on a strictly non-commercial Fair Use basis for educational/review purposes only)

My movie watch on 2 May 2022 was the thoroughly delightful French 3D/2D computer-animated fantasy film Mune: Guardian of the Moon (=Mune, le Gardien de a  Lune).

Directed by Alexandre Heboyan and Benoît Philippon (with Philippon also providing the original idea that he and Jérôme Fansten then developed into a dialogue-containing movie format), it was originally released in France in 2015 by Paramount Pictures. In 2017, it was then released in the States by GKIDS (and by Universal Pictures internationally), with an English-dubbed cast that includes Rob Lowe and Christian Slater.

Mune: Guardian of the Moon  tells the captivating story of a small planet far away in which the sun has its own guardian, and so too does the moon. On the day when the two old guardians are ceremonially replaced by two new ones, the moon side of the planet's purest creature, a kind of lunar ewe, does not choose the expected humanoid figure, Leeyoon (voiced by Slater), to be the new moon guardian but instead selects a small, inexperienced, blue rodent-like entity named Mune (Joshua J. Ballard).

Unfortunately, however, Mune's inevitable inexperience and timidity cause all manner of disasters at the beginning of his reign, much to the exasperation of Sohone (voiced by Lowe), the new super-confident sun guardian. But soon they face even worse issues when an embittered former sun guardian, Necross (Davey Grant), now inhabiting the Underworld and volcanic in form, steals the sun and plans to destroy it.

Much to their initial mutual disgust, Sohone and Mune, together with a candlewax girl named Glim (Nicole Provost) who is very knowledgeable about the ancient laws, find themselves working together to rescue the sun, defeat Necross, and fix the earlier damage caused to the moon by Mune.

The story itself thereby follows the tried and trusted path of learning to work together, respect one another's talents and differences, become friends etc. But what makes this magical movie stand out so emphatically from such all-too-familiar film fare are its highly imaginative, creative visuals (including the sun and moon being towed through the sky by a pair of gigantic creatures plodding across their respective halves of the planet), but especially the imagery of the planet's lunar half, whose fauna is truly surreal yet also exquisitely designed. I've seen reviews of this film that have likened it to a youngster's version of Avatar, and I understand why after watching it.

Equally, however, as I can personally verify, there is much to enjoy in this movie for adults too, particularly its strange luminous beauty and haunting ethereal music. Mune: Guardian of the Moon is an absolute delight – I loved it!

If you'd like to acquaint yourself with the charismatic dream-like world of Mune and Sohone, be sure to click here in order to view an official Mune: Guardian of the Moon trailer on YouTube.

To view a complete chronological listing of all of my Shuker In MovieLand blog's other film reviews and articles (each one instantly accessible via a direct clickable link), please click HERE, and please click HERE to view a complete fully-clickable alphabetical listing of them.

 

Tuesday, May 24, 2022

MR HORATIO KNIBBLES

 
Publicity photograph for Mr Horatio Knibbles (© Robert Hird/Anvil Film & Recording Group/Children's Film Foundation – reproduced here on a strictly non-commercial Fair Use basis for educational/review purposes only)

As many of you now know, I'm always on the lookout not only for strange, little-known cryptids (mystery animals) in my longstanding career as a cryptozoological investigator and author but also for strange, little-known films in my equally longstanding enthusiasm for all matters movie-related – and on Saturday morning, 21 May 2022, I happened to discover a fascinating example of the two in one! For that was when the retro-specialising UK TV channel Talking Pictures screened an enchanting yet nowadays all-but-forgotten Children's Film Foundation-associated rarity entitled Mr Horatio Knibbles.

Directed by Robert Hird, with a screenplay by Peter Blackmore (from an original story by Wally Bosco), produced by Anvil Film & Recording Group for the Children's Film Foundation (aka CFF, a non-profit UK organization that produced or sponsored short movies for children from the late 1940s to the mid-1980s), and released in 1970 (or 1971 sources differ), Mr Horatio Knibbles is a thoroughly delightful, whimsical fantasy movie. Its title character (played by Anthony Sheppard) happens to be an avuncular 6-ft-tall ever-hungry white rabbit (which may explain why his surname is pronounced 'Nibbles'). He is always dressed very nattily in jacket, waistcoat, watch chain, trousers, and top hat (and is therefore reminiscent of portrayals of the White Rabbit in various live-action Alice in Wonderland movies). However, he is invisible and inaudible to everyone except for a lonely young girl named Mary Bunting (Lesley Roach), who loves rabbits and desperately wants a pet one for her rapidly-approaching birthday, but is steadfastly refused by her kindly yet rabbit-averse parents (Bernard Horsfall and Jane Jordan Rogers).

After Mr Knibbles appears to a sad Mary, they have all sorts of amusing, innocent adventures together in the nearby woods where Mr Knibbles lives that cheer her up immensely, but thoroughly baffle and bemuse her disbelieving parents and in particular her somewhat bullish brother Tom (Gary Smith), who cannot see her new friend. Inevitably, therefore, they assume that Mary is either letting her imagination run riot or is telling them outright fibs.

Mary even claims that she has written to Mr Knibbles, addressing her letter to him at Rhododendron Manor, The Woods, Local, and posting it in a hollow tree log where a squirrel collects the mail each day at 3 pm sharp (provided of course that the postage has been paid for in nuts!). So her father decides to put an end to this nonsense by concealing himself near to said tree log just before 3 pm, totally confident that the highly unlikely scenario alleged by Mary will not take place – only to be thoroughly startled, however, when a squirrel does indeed appear, pulls out a letter from the log, and passes it to a bird who flies off with it!

Mary's birthday arrives, and she invites Mr Knibbles to her party. Due, however, in no small way by a small girl named Nancy (Rachel Brennock) who is Mary's somewhat hysterical friend, given to unnerving ear-piercing shrieking like a banshee at the slightest provocation (and especially so after Mr Knibbles agrees to become visible for her as well as Mary), he decides to take shelter for a while inside an empty water barrel, where he goes to sleep – only for the water barrel to be sealed and taken away as it had been leaking. Mary and her friend finally succeed in reclaiming it (assisted hilariously by PC Briggs (Fred Evans), a somewhat simple but good-hearted policeman, who is actually able to see Mr Knibbles due to his own love for rabbits), but when Mary tells her father that it contains her giant furry friend he angrily and dismissively declares that it is empty.

In despair, Mary calls out to Mr Knibbles inside the barrel, pleading with him to promise to appear to everyone present if the barrel is opened, which Mr Knibbles readily agrees to do. Although he cannot hear Mr Knibbles's words, Mary's father reluctantly decides to open it, to confirm once and for all to Mary and all of her birthday party guests there that Mr Knibbles is just a figment of her imagination – only of course for a now-visible, audible Mr Knibbles to duly if delicately extricate himself from the barrel (he is rather rotund!), amazing his human audience.

All ends well, with Mr Knibbles giving Mary a very special birthday present – a fluffy white pet rabbit (of normal size, thankfully!) – before bidding her a fond farewell for the time being, revealing that he is going off on holiday to Australia, but promising to visit her again when he returns home.

Needless to say, the premise of Mr Horatio Knibbles readily recalls Mary Chase's classic 1944 play Harvey (and to a much lesser extent Donnie Darko!) plus the three subsequent movies based upon it (the most famous of which is the first one, starring James Stewart and released in 1950). By being aimed at children, however, and produced over 50 years ago, it is much more light-hearted, gentle, and thoroughly endearing, yet without being cloy or twee (it is also a visual treat, filmed in vibrant colours and beautiful settings).

Indeed, for some years after its release in 1971, Mr Horatio Knibbles proved very popular with children of all ages (not to mention, I strongly suspect, a fair few adults too!), and was often shown on TV here in the UK, especially at Christmas time. However, because it features generally polite, largely well-behaved, quintessentially middle-class English children, and is set in the kind of idyllic early 1970s rural England that probably never truly existed except in movies like this one, it may well be deemed dated and even un-PC by various modern-day factions nowadays, thereby explaining why such a lovely little movie (only an hour long) has unjustly sunk into almost total obscurity.

Consequently, although quite some time ago I'd watched a few excerpts from it on YouTube, I never expected to view Mr Horatio Knibbles in its entirety, so I was very pleased indeed to catch it a couple of days ago on Talking Pictures, where I hope that it will be regularly repeated hereafter. After going AWOL from terrestrial TV for far too long, it is high time that this magical film's long-eared, mangelwurzel-munching star is introduced to new and future generations of youngsters – given such an opportunity, they will, I'm sure, be just as enthralled by Mr Knibbles as their parents and grandparents were, all those many years ago.

If you'd like to view some excerpts from Mr Horatio Knibbles currently present on YouTube, be sure to click here to view its opening scene, here to view its closing scene, plus here, and here. Moreover, it is now available to purchase in DVD format as part of a CFF nine-movie bumper DVD box set released by the British Film Institute (BFI).

To view a complete chronological listing of all of my Shuker In MovieLand blog's other film reviews and articles (each one instantly accessible via a direct clickable link), please click HERE, and please click HERE to view a complete fully-clickable alphabetical listing of them.

 
A scene from Mr Horatio Knibbles in which he appears (invisibly except to Mary) with Tom (in tan-coloued jumper) and his friends, plus Mary alongside him and her mother sitting on a bench in the background watching them (© Robert Hird/Anvil Film & Recording Group/Children's Film Foundation – reproduced here on a strictly non-commercial Fair Use basis for educational/review purposes only)

 

Sunday, May 22, 2022

MOONCHILD

 
Publicity poster for Moonchild (© Alan Gadney/Filmmakers Ltd – reproduced here on a strictly non-commercial Fair Use basis for educational/review purposes only)

On 19 May 2022, I watched one of the strangest films that I have ever seen (and that's saying something for me!). Not to be confused with the werewolf movie of the same title released two years earlier (not that it could ever be confused with any other movie, shared title or otherwise, frankly!), this trippy, quintessentially '70s fantasy confection of great visual beauty but insuperably abstruse content is Moonchild.

Directed and written by Alan Gadney, filmed by him in 1971, and given a limited commercial release by Filmmakers Ltd in 1974 (during which its somewhat melodramatic publicity marketed it as a horror movie, which I don't consider it to be at all), Moonchild actually originated as a university student film, a project produced and submitted by Gadney for his Masters degree thesis at the University of Southern California. I'd previously read a fair amount about Moonchild before finally watching it, which was just as well, because for much of its length its plot is by no means evident, and even when events ultimately seem more lucid, it is by no means certain that they actually are. This presumably explains why I have read several different interpretations of the storyline, but here is mine.

Moonchild opens with an art student (played by Mark Travis), whose name is eventually revealed to be Gavalin (spelling?) and whose zodiac birth sign is Cancer (with Moonchild being a name often applied to Cancerians, hence the memorable title of this movie) painting on canvas a former Christian mission, now converted into a desert hotel but retaining its very imposing original architectural beauty. While painting, he is approached by an amicable but decidedly eccentric old man (John Carradine) who introduces himself as a poet and Walker of the World, or Mr Walker for short. After giving the student some ungratefully-received advice regarding his artwork, Walker suggests that they visit the mission so that the student can see its impressive appearance at close hand.

When they enter it, however, they are swiftly confronted by the hotel's very severe and decidedly unfriendly Manager (Pat Renella), who coerces the student into booking in as a guest, with Walker also booking in. The student is allocated a room whose number is 7 (which is later seen to have especial significance).

The student soon discovers that the hotel is populated by a host of bizarre, highly mysterious, secretive persons. These include a hunchbacked simpleton named Homunculus (Frank Corsentino) who serves as a lackey (and is one of the very few characters in this film to sport an actual name); a shrewish, vituperative housekeeper/maid (Marie Denn); and a good-natured, ancient-looking man who turns out to be an alchemist (William Challee) and may have created Homunculus. Most distinctive of all, however, is the Maitre D' (Victor Buono), who is a religious zealot of volcanic temperament, liable to erupt at any moment, especially when confronting the Manager, with whom he has a decidedly inimical emotional relationship. There is also an enigmatic young woman (Janet Landgard) who appears fleetingly, but whenever she is pursued by Travis, who experiences vivid flashbacks featuring the two of them in scenes of romance and sexual passion, she somehow disappears.

The student also experiences other flashbacks, in which he is a soldier and various other persons, as well as visualizing an ecclesiastical inquisition attended by red-garbed monks, plus the maid as a fanatical prosecutor, and the Maitre D' as the Grand Inqusitor, with the student and the alchemist on trial for heresy. It is here that the student – and the movie's audience – finally learns that his name is Gavalin (he had somehow managed to forget it until then). Walker is also present, recording the proceedings but also attempting to plead the student's case, only to be harshly rebuked by the Inquisitor for interceding on the latter's behalf instead of confining himself to recording the trial.

These flashbacks appear repeatedly throughout the movie, interspersed between scenes of the student at the hotel, and can be quite disorienting due to their abrupt appearances and mystifying content – until, at last, all is revealed…or is it?

Apparently, the student is trapped inside some kind of reincarnation cycle, and so too within his cycle are all of the persons at the hotel. Every 25 years, he finds himself back at the hotel, from which he duly escapes, but is soon killed, and is then reborn, over and over again, down through time, with his present life being his seventh – hence the significance of his hotel room's number. Only when his sins are purged from his soul can the cycle end – and only then will he find salvation and peace, as too will all of those trapped alongside him within his cycle. According to one review of this movie that I've read, in his first, original life the student was himself a killer, a murderer, but I personally saw no firm evidence for this in the movie, unless the reviewer was referring to the past life in which the student was a soldier?

In addition, it appears that the Maire D' and the Manager are fighting one another for the student's soul, the former upon the side of good, the latter upon the side of evil (though again I've read reviews claiming that the Maitre D' represents evil). In addition, the alchemist is denounced as a heretic because as an embryonic scientist he challenges religious orthodoxy, and the student's interest in his activities brings him into conflict with the Maitre D' too, as does his fervour for the elusive young woman, who personifies lust. And through it all, Walker records it all, and speaks in riddles, as does everyone else, for that matter, for much of the movie's length.

Finally, in the movie's eventful climax, the student breaks free of the hotel, escaping into the hills with the alchemist, who informs him that he has fled further this time than in any previous life (meaning that he has shed more sins this time?) – but the Manager is in hot, murderous pursuit! Moreover, as the reincarnation theme of the movie has by now been revealed to its audience by the characters, it's no spoiler to say that because the student has still not attained a state of total purity, he does not elude the Manager.

Instead, inevitably, the student meets his end yet again – only for the final scene to see him very much alive outside the mission, just like he was at the beginning of the movie, but this time equipped not with a canvas and easel to capture its appearance but with a movie camera instead, confirming that time (and attendant technology) has advanced quite considerably (another quarter-century) since his previous arrival there. And who should walk up and begin talking to him again? None other than Mr Walker, of course – because the student's reincarnation cycle has begun once more. But will his eighth life end in salvation for him at last? The movie has reached its end, so we never find out.

The only movie that I've ever seen which in any way reminds me of Moonchild is Malpertuis (click here to read my review of it). Both are dark fantasies infused with an almost tangibly malign atmosphere, peopled by an unfathomable company of grotesque characters, and ensconced within an otherworldly, preternatural setting ostensibly contained within our reality yet effectively delineated from it, which cycles incessantly. Indeed, some reviewers consider Moonchild to be a New Age-inspired allegory for the grand circle of life that drives our entire planet and everything that exists within it.

Best acting performance for me in Moonchild is definitely Carradine's, endowing the twinkly-eyed and somewhat loquacious Walker with the necessary mystique and verbal dexterity to yield a convincing, ever-interesting 'Keeper of Words' (one of his own description of himself). And the much-missed Victor Buono could always be relied upon to give his customary masterclass in delightfully hammy, unrestrained over-acting, with his OTT Maitre D' virtually chewing the scenery during his hyper-histrionic theological outbursts against the Manager, the student, and anyone else he happens to encounter!

The sumptuous scenes inside the mission/hotel and its architecturally spectacular exterior were reputedly filmed at the Riverside Hotel in California, And apart from a pervasive greenish lunar tinge most prominent in scenes of the student fleeing through never-ending subterranean tunnels and passages within the hotel's claustrophobic foundations from pursuing figures in sinister black robes and hoods with unseen faces and undetermined motives, the colours inside the hotel are vibrant and very diverse. As for its music, this is unequivocally late 1960s/early 1970s in style, as epitomized by its haunting, psychedelic opening theme song.

Some reviewers have variously written off Moonchild as pretentious unmitigated nonsense or impenetrable art-house folderol, and it may have been its overall rejection by audiences and critics alike at the time of its release that resulted in Gadney becoming a cinematic one-hit wonder, inasmuch as Moonchild is the first and only movie that he ever directed. If so, this is a great shame, because notwithstanding its baffling plot, I personally found Moonchild to be an immensely engrossing albeit incredibly surreal fantasy, beautifully filmed and thoroughly captivating, and I can only wonder what extraordinary movies Gadney would certainly have gone on to direct had he stayed in the world of film-making, refining his creativity and expanding his directorial experience.

I also wonder how a mere student producing a movie simply as a university project was able to enlist such a starry cast as John Carradine, Victor Buono, and William Challee. Yet like so much else concerning Moonchild, it seems unlikely that we shall ever know the answer to this mystery.

Moonchild may not be for everyone, but if like me you enjoy arcane Gothic fantasies with caliginous plots set in exquisite surroundings, then I definitely encourage you to give this undeniably weird but unjustly neglected masterpiece of the macabre a viewing – especially as if you click here you can currently watch the entire movie free of charge on YouTube.

To view a complete chronological listing of all of my Shuker In MovieLand blog's other film reviews and articles (each one instantly accessible via a direct clickable link), please click HERE, and please click HERE to view a complete fully-clickable alphabetical listing of them.

 
The student (Mark Travis) and the Maitre D' (Victor Buono) (© Alan Gadney/Filmmakers Ltd – reproduced here on a strictly non-commercial Fair Use basis for educational/review purposes only).