Dr Karl Shuker's Official Website - http://www.karlshuker.com/index.htm

IMPORTANT:
To view a complete, regularly-updated listing of my Shuker In MovieLand blog's articles (each one instantly clickable), please click HERE!

IMPORTANT:

To view a complete, regularly-updated listing of my ShukerNature blog's articles (each one instantly clickable), please click HERE!

IMPORTANT:
To view a complete, regularly-updated listing of my RebelBikerDude's AI Biker Art's thematic text & picture galleties (each one instantly clickable), please click HERE!

IMPORTANT:
To view a complete, regularly-updated listing of my Starsteeds blog's poetry and other lyrical writings (each one instantly clickable), please click HERE!

IMPORTANT:
To view a complete, regularly-updated listing of my Eclectarium blog's articles (each one instantly clickable), please click HERE!


Search This Blog


Showing posts with label super-hero. Show all posts
Showing posts with label super-hero. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 18, 2023

HANCOCK

 
Publicity still for Hancock (© Peter Berg/Columbia Pictures/Relativity Media/Overbrook Entertainment/Weed Road ictures/Forward Pass/Blue Light/Sony Pictures Releasing – reproduced here on a strictly non-commercial Fair Use Basis for educational/review purposes only)

On 13 April 2023, my movie watch was the comedy/drama super-hero film Hancock, directed by Peter Berg, released in 2008 by Sony Pictures, and starring Will Smith as its title character.

Hancock (full name John Hancock, but mostly addressed only by his surname) is an alcoholic washed-up super-hero who spends much of his time slumped on public benches in Los Angeles sleeping off his latest hangover. And when he does attempt to fight crime, he does so in such a rambunctious manner amid his perpetual drunken stupor that he generally wreaks more havoc than the criminals do!

Not surprisingly, therefore, Hancock is not popular among the populace, or loved by LA's official law upholders. Then one day, albeit more by luck than likelihood, he saves the life of a public relations man named Ray Embrey (Jason Bateman). Profoundly grateful, Ray vows to overhaul Hancock's bad behaviour and exceedingly poor public profile, so that he is loved and valued by everyone for the super-hero he truly is – even if that means Hancock voluntarily surrendering himself for a period of incarceration in jail to atone for his anarchic actions and make people appreciate him when during his absence the city crime rate escalates. Does this sound like a winning plan to you when Hancock is involved? No, me neither!

Strangely, however, and irrespective of the decidedly bizarre modus operandi involved, this well-intentioned plan meets with a decidedly unenthusiastic, underwhelming response from Ray's wife Mary (Charlize Theron), And for good reason – not only does she have super powers too, but which she has steadfastly kept hidden from Ray, their young son Aaron (Jae Head), and everyone else, she also happens to be Hancock's wife too, and for far longer than she has been Ray's. In fact, she has been married to Hancock for more than two millennia, because she and he are 3,000-year-old super-beings who never age.

Of course, Ray knows nothing of this astonishing (not to mention technically bigamous!) situation, but neither does Hancock. For it turns out that after being attacked 80 years earlier while defending Mary from muggers, he woke up in hospital with amnesia and has no memory whatsoever of his life, including anyone in it, prior to that incident. He even assumes (wrongly, obviously) that his super powers are somehow the result of having suffered head injuries during the attack.

And as if this surreal scenario were not complicated enough already, the closer that super-beings like Mary and Hancock become to each other, as they inevitably do when married, the more mortal and therefore vulnerable to physical injury and death they become. This is how Hancock came to be injured by the muggers, and why Mary did not renew their relationship afterwards – she knew that his recovery and ongoing survival depended upon distance between them being maintained.

Moreover, back in the present day but unbeknownst to both of them, vengeful villain Kenneth 'Red' Parker Jr (Eddie Marsan), who holds a serious grudge against Hancock for chopping off one of his hands to prevent him blowing up a large group of hostages during a failed bank robbery attempt, is hot on their trail. Assisted by his team of henchmen, Red intends to destroy Hancock (especially) and Mary, as they are the last two super-beings still alive on Earth, all others having died long ago. This could – and does – get nasty, very nasty...

Hancock is a very enjoyable fantasy movie, especially the first half, which is solid comedy, but its mood becomes increasingly darker in the second half once Mary's true nature and her relationship to Hancock emerge, with the climax being decidedly grim – and not in a fairy tale way either! (Apparently, the original screenplay was even darker, and contained more violence and adult language. but its tone was lightened considerably during subsequent revisions in order for it to be given a cinema rating that would make it accessible to a wider audience; it finally received a PG-13 rating after earlier pre-release showings had twice received an R.)

Throughout it all, however, Smith portrays Hancock very effectively as a likeable if somewhat lost soul pushed by Ray into reluctantly seeking redemption, with the audience willing him to succeed thanks to an empathic performance by Smith that is the key to this movie's success.

Interestingly, during the decade or so that the original script for Hancock (or John Hancock or Tonight, He Comes – to cite this movie's two previously-suggested titles) had been  doing the rounds in Hollywood, several other prominent actors had been considered for its title character. They include the likes of Ben Affleck, Dave Chappelle, George Clooney, Matt Damon, and Leonardo DiCaprio, but personally I can't imagine any of them – immensely talented performers though they all are – creating the truly captivating character that Hancock is under the acting auspices of Smith.

Also worth noting is that ever since Hancock was released in 2008 and became a big earner, plans have been floating around for a sequel, to star Smith and Theron reprising their roles (both having announced their willingness to return), and with a third super-being character to be added to the mix. As yet, however, no formal commitment to produce such a film has been made.

If you're interested in watching a very different super-hero movie from the more traditional types, be sure to click here to view an official Hancock trailer to get a feel for what to expect. And speaking of atypical super-heroes – click here to read my Shuker In MovieLand review of Brightburn, here to read my review of Howard the Duck, and both here and here to read my reviews of the Deadpool movies.

Finally: to view a complete chronological listing of all of my Shuker In MovieLand blog's other film reviews and articles (each one instantly accessible via a direct clickable link), please click HERE, and please click HERE to view a complete fully-clickable alphabetical listing of them.

 
Official UK DVD for Hancock (© Peter Berg/Columbia Pictures/Relativity Media/Overbrook Entertainment/Weed Road ictures/Forward Pass/Blue Light/Sony Pictures Releasing – reproduced here on a strictly non-commercial Fair Use Basis for educational/review purposes only)

 

Tuesday, September 27, 2022

BRIGHTBURN

 
Publicity poster for Brightburn (© David Yarovesky/Screen Gems/Stage 6 Films/The H Collective/Troll Court Entertainment/Sony Pictures – reproduced here on a strictly non-commercial Fair Use basis for educational/review purposes only)

On 9 July 2022, I watched the anti-superhero movie Brightburn, which was directed by David Yarovesky, and released in 2019 by Sony Pictures.

I call Brightburn an anti-superhero movie, because what it does, and very effectively too, is take the basic Superman premise but give it a totally different spin, a seriously twisted twist, in fact, yet one that is not only truly horrific in parts but also mesmerisingly engrossing throughout.

Just as in Superman, a childless couple (named Tori and Kyle Breyer, played by Elizabeth Banks and David Denman) living in a small American town find a crashed spacecraft nearby containing an alien but wholly humanoid infant boy whom they adopt and rear as their own, naming him Brandon (played in scarily sinister mode by Jackson A. Dunn).

All goes well until Brandon hits puberty, and discovers that he possesses super powers. He also uncovers the spacecraft, which Tori and Kyle have been keeping hidden from him inside a locked underground chamber within their barn, because it starts sending out aural signals and messages that guide him to it.

From then on, the story deviates fundamentally from that of Superman, because whereas he sided with good, Brandon turns evil, hideously destroying anyone who angers him, including the mother of a girl, Caitlyn, from school who'd embarrassed him, his uncle Noah who'd lost his temper with him, etc.

Tori loves Brandon so much that she doesn't want to believe that he is responsible for these murders, but Kyle suspects the truth, and on a hunting trip he attempts to shoot Brandon dead, but the bullet merely ricochets off his head, leaving Brandon unharmed but extremely vengeful towards his father – uh-oh...

As I say, Brightburn is a largely original (albeit decidedly gory in parts) take on the tried and trusted superhero back story (though DC Comics' series of Ultraman supervillains pursue a somewhat similar course in terms of being anti-Superman figures), with striking special effects in parts. Moreover, it proved sufficiently successful at the box office for a sequel to be planned.

As for this movie's title, Brightburn is both the name of the Kansas town where Tori and Kyle lived with Brandon and the name applied to Brandon himself by news reports once he has begun his reign of terror as an adult, dressed in full superhero cape and hideous mask regalia.

So if you'd enjoy a sharp and decidedly savage twist upon the familiar Superman story, be sure to click here to watch a thrilling, chilling official trailer for Brightburn on YouTube.

To view a complete chronological listing of all of my Shuker In MovieLand blog's other film reviews and articles (each one instantly accessible via a direct clickable link), please click HERE, and please click HERE to view a complete fully-clickable alphabetical listing of them.

 

Monday, March 1, 2021

BIRDMAN

 
Meet Birdman, from Birdman (© Alejandro G. Iñárritu/Regency Enterprises/New Regency/M Productions/Le Grisbi Productions/TSG Entertainment/Worldview Entertainment/Fox Searchlight Pictures – reproduced here on a strictly non-commercial Fair Use basis for educational/review purposes only)

A couple of months ago I posted on Facebook the Rotten Tomatoes list of its Top 100 Movies of All Time (click here to access it), and on 28 January 2021 I watched the DVD of #89 on it, Birdman. This must surely be the oddest movie ever to win an Academy Award for Best Picture, which it did in 2015 at the 87th annual Academy Awards ceremony. Nevertheless, as a big fan of the super-hero movie genre I fully expected to be pleasantly surprised by this film. Let's just say that I was surprised by it…

Directed by Alejandro G. Iñárritu, and released in 2014, Birdman focuses upon long-since faded actor Riggan Thomson (played by Michael Keaton). Two decades earlier, Thomson had been a major movie star, thanks to his massively successful on-screen role as super-hero Birdman – a bizarre character garbed in cerulean-hued avian attire complete with a sizeable pair of fully-feathered, fully-functional wings whose mighty pinions enable him to soar through the sky in pursuit of villains and other ne'er-do-wells.

At the very peak of his – and Birdman's – popularity, however, Thomson abruptly quit the role, and subsequently sank into obscurity. Now, he is attempting to make a belated comeback, but on his own terms, by directing and also starring in a Broadway play that he considers to be a worthy, literary production that will win him the critical acclaim that he always longed for, rather than the public adoration accorded him by his blockbuster Birdman movies.

Unfortunately, however, Thomson's hopes are not being realized, with Fate seemingly determined to thwart them at every available opportunity, and when his play's co-star is abruptly taken out of action via a bizarre freak accident, only to be replaced by a famous but infuriatingly pedantic method actor named Mike Shiner (Edward Norton), events rapidly go from already bad to even worse. Moreover, in an attempt to keep a close watch over his teenage daughter Sam (Emma Stone), a former drug addict, and help her stay on the straight and narrow, Thomson employs her as his PR, but as Sam clearly despises him and has no interest in the theatre, this plan is not working out too well either.

And as if all of these woes were not enough for him to deal with during his increasingly desperate attempts to turn impending disaster into increasingly unlikely success, Thomson is persistently mocked and psychologically undermined by a voice that may or may not be inside his head but which is apparently that of his former movie alter-ego Birdman, who alternately commands and cajoles him to forgo his futile attempts to be a worthy actor and return instead to being a mega-successful one in his Birdman role. We also see Thomson apparently performing some of his erstwhile super-hero feats in reality, such as telekinesis and levitation, but only ever when he is alone, never when anyone else is with him – so is he really doing this, or only imagining that he is? Ditto with the voice of Birdman – only Thomson hears it, no-one else does.

All very weird to say the least, replete with unresolved fantastical versus psychological ambiguity, but also, fatally, containing what proved for me to be some insurmountable, inescapable distractions. Namely, Keaton's perpetual, largely-unintelligible mumbling (he should have taken note of co-star Norton's lucid diction), and, above all else, the near-perpetual racket of a guy playing a full drum kit for no discernible reason other than to make hearing what the cast are saying even more difficult.

Why this insistent, almost incessant drumming through the film? The drummer and his drum kit are even seen on occasion – busking on the pavement outside the theatre, for example, and within an otherwise empty room inside the theatre, so it isn't just a soundtrack idiosyncrasy. No doubt this pernicious paradiddling has some deep symbolic meaning that will resonate with avant-garde aficionados, but for poor simple me it was just an ongoing aural annoyance that helped make some virtually inaudible dialogue even more so. And who thought it a clever idea for the performers to deliver their mumbling not only against an auditory backdrop of drumming but also with their backs to the camera sometimes, so that even lip-reading was foiled?

With these notable negatives added to what was in any case for me a turgid, often ridiculous plot, after watching halfway through Birdman I actually paused my DVD of it and left it alone for about an hour, in order to give my pained ears and numbed brain a chance to recover before ploughing through its second half.

This latter half was marginally better, but only because Birdman himself finally made his long-anticipated visual debut (as opposed to merely his disembodied voice throughout the first half), albeit only in an all-too-brief single scene (not counting his 'blink and you'll miss him' appearance sitting on the toilet near the movie's end...). As already noted above and also seen in this review's opening image, Birdman's costume is spectacular, especially his wings. Why, therefore, didn't he feature more extensively in the film, and Thomson's self-indulgent, self-pitying navel-gazing scenes less so?

After all, it is Birdman who is the novelty, the quirk, that sets this movie apart and defines it (hence its title, Birdman). So why utilise him so sparingly, relegated to little more than a walk-on (or fly-on?) part visually, merely a cameo appearance? Instead, we are treated to the dubious thrill of discovering whether Thomson's play is indeed a success, and an anti-climactic ending that is as disappointingly baffling as much else in this bewildering movie.

At the risk of sounding harsh, Birdman was 1 hour 54 minutes of my life wasted – as a result of which my advice to others would be to watch a clip containing the 5 minutes or so in which Birdman himself appears and forget the rest of what came across to me as predominantly pretentious nonsense. How it ever won Best Picture at the Oscars I just don't know, especially when it was up against such infinitely more deserving nominees in my opinion as The Imitation Game, The Theory of Everything, and The Grand Budapest Hotel.

Having said that, everyone's tastes are different – just because Birdman did nothing for me, that's not to say that you wouldn't like it. So why not find out for yourself by clicking here to watch a mercifully drumming-free Birdman trailer on YouTube? Who knows, it may be the very movie that you've waited your entire life for. Then again…

And to view a complete listing of all of my Shuker In MovieLand blog's other film reviews and articles (each one instantly accessible via a direct clickable link), please click HERE!


Wednesday, February 17, 2021

MAX STEEL

 
Publicity banner for Max Steel (© Stewart Hendler/Dolphin Films/Mattel Playground Productions/Ingenious Media/Open Road Films – reproduced here on a strictly non-commercial Fair Use basis for educational/review purposes only)

Courtesy of the British TV channel Film4, on 21 January 2021 I watched the live-action super-hero movie Max Steel (as opposed to the animated TV series and movie featuring this same character), which was directed by Stewart Hendler, released in 2016, and based upon the eponymous action figure toy line produced by Mattel.

It's not often that a movie receives a rating of 0% on the Rotten Tomatoes website. Consequently, I was expecting a total disaster, but was pleasantly surprised – although in view of the fact that I almost invariably love the movies that critics hate, I suppose that I really shouldn't have been.

Max Steel is all about a teenager named Max McGrath (played by Ben Winchell) who begins emitting powerful, unstable tachyonic energy (no, me neither), but he is stabilised by a small yet exceedingly garrulous flying machine-like alien named Steel, who very fortuitously lives exclusively upon tachyonic energy (as you do). He also wants to bond with Max and protect him, which he does, creating during their bonding sessions the armour-clad dual entity Max Steel – so that's where the movie's title comes from. Never say that this blog isn't educational!

Moreover, it's just as well that Steel has turned up, because it now turns out that Max is being hunted down by immensely powerful, tornado-engendering aliens called ultralinks, but which just so happen to look exactly like Steel... Plus Max's father Jim, who died in mysterious circumstances when Max was just a baby, is directly linked to all of the mysteries now threatening to encompass him.

Who can Max turn to for help? Neither his mother nor his girlfriend they just wouldn't undrstand...or would they? How about Dr Miles Edwards (played by Andy Garcia), his father's friend and co-worker? Hmmm….

True, Max Steel is hardly Avatar, nor indeed Gone With The Wind or Citizen Kane, but neither does it deserve the immense amount of opprobrium that has been heaped upon it. On the contrary, Max Steel passed 90 minutes or so very enjoyably for me, which is what I look for in a film (and which in turn is why I have since purchased it on DVD). So call me easily pleased, I can take it!

And if you're interested in finding out for yourself what Max Steel is like, please click here to view an official trailer for it on YouTube. You can thank me later.

And to view a complete listing of all of my Shuker In MovieLand blog's other film reviews and articles (each one instantly accessible via a direct clickable link), please click HERE!

 

Thursday, December 31, 2020

ONCE UPON A DEADPOOL

 
The official Region 1 Blu-Ray/DVD dual pack of Once Upon A Deadpool (sadly, it has never been released in Region 2, UK/Europe, format) (© Tim Miller/20th Century Fox/Marvel Entertainment/Kinberg Genre/The Donners' Company/TSG Entertainment - reproduced here on a strictly non-commercial Fair Use basis for educational/review purposes only)

After inflicting untold and unprecedented misery upon the entire world, 2020 is in dire need of being booted into touch at the end of today – and who better to apply said boot than Deadpool? So here, as the subject of my final Shuker In MovieLand review for this year, is a lesser-known cinematic offering starring him.

After purchasing online several months ago a Region 1 Blu-Ray/DVD dual pack of Once Upon A Deadpool from the States that, sadly, never arrived, getting a refund, then recently purchasing another one of it that, happily, did arrive, on 2 December 2020 I finally managed to watch this interesting departure from the typical pathway trodden by Deadpool movies.

 
My two official Marvel resin Deadpool figurines (© Marvel / photo © Dr Karl Shuker - reproduced here on a strictly non-commercial Fair Use basis for educational/review purposes only)

This is because Once Upon A Deadpool, released in December 2016, is a special toned-down PG-13 version of Deadpool 2, starring Ryan Reynolds as Marvel Comics' irrepressible Wade Wilson/Deadpool – my all-time favourite comic book anti-/super-hero and fourth wall demolisher par excellence.

As a massive Deadpool fan, I had already watched and greatly enjoyed the unedited Deadpool 2 (click here to read my Shuker In MovieLand review of it, plus my review of the first Deadpool movie). Consequently, the reason why I also wanted this milder version is that it is actually much more than just that.

 
Wearing my official Deadpool & Wolverine t-shirt (© Marvel / photo © Dr Karl Shuker - reproduced here on a strictly non-commercial Fair Use basis for educational/review purposes only)

For Once Upon A Deadpool contains several hilarious new segments featuring Deadpool reading the actual story of the movie (which is the same as in Deadpool 2) to an adult Fred Savage, who famously starred many years earlier as an unrelentingly nice, sweet-natured child in The Wonder Years TV show. Moreover, this initially unexpected addition is soon revealed to be a wickedly funny parody of the fantasy movie The Princess Bride (1987), which of course opened with Peter Falk telling a sanitised version of the movie's storyline to a young Fred in bed – even the bedroom in which the Deadpool segments are shot is a direct take-off of the bedroom in The Princess Bride.

Being a Deadpool movie, however, there is naturally a twist, which is that Fred is tied down, so he has to listen to Deadpool reading him the story, whether or not he wants to – which he definitely doesn't at the beginning! Priceless, and well worth the trials and tribulations endured by me in obtaining the DVD of this film.

 
My plastic Deadpool & Wolverine poster that tields three different images depending upon the angle at which it is viewed (© Marvel / photo © Dr Karl Shuker - reproduced here on a strictly non-commercial Fair Use basis for educational/review purposes only)

Additionally, despite the veritable avalanche of expletives and mindless violence that so characterize Deadpool movies, Once Upon A Deadpool still successfully entertains with consummate ease even though these twin trademarks are largely absent – an interesting turn of events. Equally interesting - or, to be precise, ironic - is that here in the UK, Once Upon A Deadpool actually received the very same film classification ratings certificate, 15, as the unexpurgated Deadpool 2 did! As my American friends would say, go figure!

If you're a Deadpool fan, or even just a fan of super-heroes in general, you definitely need to see Once Upon a Deadpool – a wonderful addition to the Deadpool movie canon. So, to whet your appetite, click here to view its official trailer, and here to view the delightfully droll opening scene, in which Fred finds himself to be a captive audience of Deadpool – literally!

 
My official Marvel/Hasbro 12"-tall Deadpool action figure (© Marvel/Hasbro / photo © Dr Karl Shuker - reproduced here on a strictly non-commercial Fair Use basis for educational/review purposes only)

And to view a complete listing of all of my Shuker In MovieLand blog's other film reviews and articles (each one instantly accessible via a direct clickable link), please click HERE! 

 
Photo-still from the highly amusing opening scene in Once Upon A Deadpool Tim Miller/20th Century Fox/Marvel Entertainment/Kinberg Genre/The Donners' Company/TSG Entertainment - reproduced here on a strictly non-commercial Fair Use basis for educational/review purposes only)