Dr Karl Shuker's Official Website - http://www.karlshuker.com/index.htm

IMPORTANT:
To view a complete, regularly-updated listing of my Shuker In MovieLand blog's articles (each one instantly clickable), please click HERE!

IMPORTANT:

To view a complete, regularly-updated listing of my ShukerNature blog's articles (each one instantly clickable), please click HERE!

IMPORTANT:
To view a complete, regularly-updated listing of my RebelBikerDude's AI Biker Art's thematic text & picture galleties (each one instantly clickable), please click HERE!

IMPORTANT:
To view a complete, regularly-updated listing of my Starsteeds blog's poetry and other lyrical writings (each one instantly clickable), please click HERE!

IMPORTANT:
To view a complete, regularly-updated listing of my Eclectarium blog's articles (each one instantly clickable), please click HERE!


Search This Blog


Showing posts with label Pinocchio. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pinocchio. Show all posts

Sunday, March 31, 2024

A.I. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

 
Publicity poster for A.I. Artificial Intelligence (© Steven Spielberg/DreamWorks Pictures/Amblin Entertainment/Stanley Kubrick Productions/Warner Bros Pictures – reproduced here on a strictly non-commercial basis for educational/review purposes only)

My movie watch on 4 January 2024 was one of the most delightful, engrossing, and achingly poignant futuristic sci fi films that I have viewed for a very long time. Namely, A.I. Artificial Intelligence.

Directed by Steven Spielberg, released in 2001 by Warners Bros Pictures, and including collaborations with Stanley Kubrick, A.I. Artificial Intelligence is set in the 22nd Century. It stars in mesmerising form (as Spielberg's first and only choice for this role) a young Haley Joel Osment (he of "I see dead people" fame from The Sixth Sense, released 2 years previously) as robot boy David, the first in a major new android (aka Mecha) lineage – a humanoid robot that can truly love, created by computer genius Prof. Allen Hobby (William Hurt).

The movie intentionally plays out like a sci fi version of Pinocchio, having been loosely based upon a 1969 Pinocchio-inspired short story 'Supertoys Last All Summer Long', written by sci fi maestro Brian Aldiss. (Interestingly, this short story's film rights had originally been acquired by Stanley Kubrick, way back in the 1970s, but after failing to achieve success in its cinematic production he finally passed it over in 1995 to Spielberg, who began working on it in earnest following Kubrick's death in 1999, and dedicated the finished movie to him.)

For after hearing his human adoptive mother Monica Swinton (Frances O'Connor) read the famous Carlo Collodi story Pinocchio to her real-life son Martin, David blindly believes the story to be true.

Consequently, after subsequently being abandoned by his mother once jealous Martin is fully recovered fron a near-fatal ailment and causes all manner of problems for him, and accompanied by loyal and self-aware Teddy, Martin's unwanted robot teddy bear (voiced by Jack Angel), David sets out to locate the Blue Fairy. During his quest, he encounters a law-fleeing gigolo android named Joe (Jude Law, providing some much-needed lightness to this movie's sometimes almost overpowering pathos).

Joe helps David look for the Blue Fairy, whom David fervently hopes will transform him into a real boy, because he believes that his mother will then love him like she loves Martin. And indeed, after being assisted by Joe and a holographic answer engine named Dr Know (voiced by Robin Williams), David does find the Blue Fairy, after a fashion – thanks to a race of immensely-advanced Mechas known as the Specialists (one of whom is voiced by Ben Kingsley).

They discover him and Teddy frozen in ice two thousand years later, long after humans have died out during a new Ice Age (so much for global warming!), and not only successfully revive them but also recreate from David's memories an interactive version of the Blue Fairy (voiced by Meryl Streep).

Moreover, these Specialists are even able to restore David's mother to life, albeit for just a single day, after cloning her from her DNA (preserved in a strand of her hair that David had clipped back when he and Teddy had lived with her, and which Teddy had kept safe ever since). Now, during this most precious day back with his temporarily-restored mother, David enjoys with her the only birthday party he has ever known, and just as the day is ending his mother tells him that she has always loved him, thus giving him the assurance that he has always yearned for, and enabling him to be finally content. Then she slips into eternal sleep, and David, for the very first time, also falls asleep, journeying at last to the land where dreams are born.

To say that I found this closing scene moving would be the understatement of the millennium, but it also brought back some very precious memories, borne sweetly upon the haunting music score of this movie, composed by the indefatigable John Williams (who received an Oscar nomination for it). A.I. Artificial Intelligence is an enchanting film that I shall long remember, and for all the right reasons.

Tomorrow is the eleventh anniversary of my own dear mother's passing, so it seemed a very appropriate, fitting time for me to present this particular movie review of mine. God bless you, little Mom, how I wish with all my heart that you were still here with me, even if it were only for 24 hours – how I would cherish those precious hours with you, forever.

If you wish to experience a very special preview of the cinematic magic and wonder awaiting you in A.I. Artificial Intelligence, be sure to click here to watch a trailer for this movie on YouTube.

Finally: to view a complete chronological listing of all of my Shuker In MovieLand blog's other film reviews and articles (each one instantly accessible via a direct clickable link), please click HERE, and please click HERE to view a complete fully-clickable alphabetical listing of them.

 
My mother, Mary Shuker (© Dr Karl Shuker)

 

 

Saturday, December 31, 2022

PINOCCHIO VS PINOCCHIO – OR, DEL TORO ORIGINAL VS DISNEY REMAKE

 
Publicity poster and soundtrack album for Guillermo Del Toro's Pinocchio and Walt Disney's Pinocchio live-action/CGI 2022 remake respectively (© Guillermo Del Toro/Mark Gustafson/Netflix Animation/Double Dare You!/ShadowMachine/The Jim Henson Company/Taller del Chucho/Netflix / (© Robert Zemeckis/Walt Disney Pictures/Depth of Field/ImageMovers/Disney+ – both images reproduced here on a strictly non-commercial Fair Use basis for educational/review purposes only)

Few children's novels have proved as popular and ageless as Pinocchio (or The Adventures of Pinocchio, to give it its full original title), written by Italian author Carlo Collodi and first published in 1883. It famously tells the story of how a puppet carved from pine by lonely, childless woodcarver Geppetto and dubbed Pinocchio by him is magically brought to life as a wooden boy by a kindly fairy, who promises Pinocchio that if he proves himself brave, truthful, and unselfish, he will one day become a real flesh-and-blood boy. Pinocchio promises her that he will do, but he is soon led astray, falling into bad company and suffering all kinds of misfortunes as a result. Yet whenever he is challenged about his bad behaviour, Pinocchio invariably attempts to defend himself by telling lies, but every time he does so, his nose grows, and the bigger the lie, the longer his nose becomes. Eventually, however, Pinocchio redeems himself by rescuing his ever-loving creator/father Geppetto from the belly of a huge fish (or whale in certain later reimaginings) at the cost of his own life – at which point the fairy intervenes, transforming him as promised into a real boy.

Down through the decades, there have been numerous movie versions of this highly imaginative and in parts quite frightening but emphatically moralistic story. However, the most famous and best-loved is unquestionably the classic 1940 Walt Disney animated feature Pinocchio, widely deemed by movie buffs to be one of the best animated films of all time – if not THE best (and certainly one of my all-time favourites) – with its principal song 'When You Wish Upon A Star' winning an Academy Award as Best Original Song and going on to become the unofficial theme song of the entire Disney movie empire. In my film collection, I have over a dozen different big-screen interpretations of Collodi's literary legend, but in 2022 a couple of major new film versions were released, each of eminent cinematic heritage, but very different indeed in both style and storyline from one another. Having now watched both of them, one the creation of celebrated Mexican director Guillermo Del Toro, the other Disney's live-action/CGI remake of its very own 1940 animated masterpiece, here are my own personal thoughts and opinions of how well, or otherwise, they shape up.

 

 
The extraordinary electric-blue chimaera-like entity representing Death, the sister of the pale-blue Wood Sprite who gave Pinocchio life, in Guillermo Del Toro's Pinocchio (© Guillermo Del Toro/Mark Gustafson/Netflix Animation/Double Dare You!/ShadowMachine/The Jim Henson Company/Taller del Chucho/Netflix – reproduced here on a strictly non-commercial Fair Use basis for educational/review purposes only)

GUILLERMO DEL TORO'S PINOCCHIO

On 15 November 2022, I watched Guillermo Del Toro's Pinocchio, the great Mexican director's first foray into musicals and movies for youngsters, and I found it absolutely captivating, even though the songs were, with a single exception, entirely forgettable. Del Toro co-directed the film with Mark Gustafson, as well as co-producing it, co-writing its screenplay, and co-writing most of its songs, and it was released by Netflix in October (UK)/November (USA).

As one would expect from a Del Toro movie, his vision of the Pinocchio plot veers considerably from Collodi's, resetting the story in Fascist WW2 Italy, amid fighting, and bombing (plus a brief but highly comical appearance from a midget Mussolini). During one novel but notable back-story incident taking place early in the movie, Geppetto's original, human son, Carlo (a character not present in Collodi's book but named after him), is killed by a stray bomb, leading Geppetto to carve Pinocchio as a substitute.

However, the movie does also feature various more traditional Pinocchio themes, such as a talking cricket (voiced by Ewan McGregor and named Sebastian J. Cricket), Pinocchio (Gregory Mann, who also voices Carlo) being led astray and kidnapped by a shyster puppeteer (Count Volpe, voiced by Christoph Waltz), and Geppetto (David Bradley) being swallowed by a huge sea monster.

Incidentally, other notable thespians voicing characters include Ron Perlman as a Fascist government official who makes Pinocchio become a soldier, Cate Blanchett as Count Volpe's ill-treated pet monkey Spazzatura who becomes an ally of Pinocchio, and John Turturro as the village doctor.

A major new addition to the story is Pinocchio dying on three different occasions and visiting the After-Life where Death turns out to be the sister of the pale-blue four-winged seraph-like Wood Sprite (both sisters voiced by Tilda Swinton) who originally gave life to him. Death herself takes the phantasmagorical form of an electric-blue chimaera-like entity with eyed wings recalling those of the Angel of Death in Del Toro's earlier movie Hellboy 2.

Overall, therefore, this telling of the Pinocchio tale is very different from any previous one, to the extent that it is virtually an entirely original story in its own right, but no less entertaining. The stop-motion animation is superb throughout, with Pinocchio himself being both surreal in appearance (inspired by the artwork of Gris Grimly) but sweetly child-like in behaviour – loving, ultimately loyal to Geppetto, yet also wilful and carefree, his naivety inciting many of the dramatic situations in which he finds himself and those who care for him embroiled.

The movie's ending, contrasting Pinocchio's never-ageing immortality (bestowed upon him by Death in order to honour an earlier wish-granting pledge by her to Sebastian J. Cricket) with the mortality of his father and friends, is extremely poignant, as are the final words, spoken by the now-deceased cricket: "What happens, happens, and then we are gone". Yes indeed, that says it all so succinctly about life and its ending, for all of us.

And the single exception to this film musical's otherwise unmemorable collection of songs? 'Ciao Papa', co-written by Del Toro, and wistfully sung by a conscience-stricken Pinocchio as he slips away from Geppetto to join the puppet show in order to earn money for his father and prove himself worthy of his love. I see this as a major contender for a Best Original Song Academy Award nomination, even though some of its lyrics are decidedly bizarre (why would seeing a camel cry be something that Pinocchio aspires to experience one day??). Anyway, if you click here, you can view and listen to an official musical video of it on YouTube, and judge for yourself.

In short, I found Guillermo Del Toro's Pinocchio to be a truly magical movie, dark and even heart-rending in places as one would expect of any film from this director, but thoroughly enthralling throughout. And if you'd like a sneak preview of it, be sure to click here to watch an official trailer on YouTube.

UPDATE: Sadly, 'Ciao Papa' did not receive an Academy Award nomination (which surely IS enough to make a camel cry!). However, this surprising omission was more than adequately compensated for when at the Academy Awards ceremony held in March 2023 Guillermo Del Toro's Pinocchio did win the Academy Award for Best Animated Feature - and deservedly so!

 

 
The redesigned multi-winged Blue Fairy in Disney's 2022 live-action/CGI Pinocchio (© Robert Zemeckis/Walt Disney Pictures/Depth of Field/ImageMovers/Disney+ – reproduced here on a strictly non-commercial Fair Use basis for educational/review purposes only)

PINOCCHIO (Disney live-action/CGI 2022 remake)

On 10 December 2022, I watched the Disney live-action/CGI remake (hereafter referred to for convenience as Pinocchio 2022) of its beloved 1940 animated classic, Pinocchio (hereafter referred to as Pinocchio 1940), released in September 2022 on Disney+. Yet in spite of its being directed by the legendary Robert Zemeckis, who also co-wrote its screenplay, what a travesty this remake is, at least as far as I'm concerned.

Succinctness is replaced by endless monologues (yes, Blue Fairy, I'm thinking of you!), with sweetness usurped by vulgarity (what precisely was the reasoning or purpose behind Pinocchio – voiced by Benjamin Evan Ainsworth – paying rapt attention to a decidedly large, fly-attracting horse turd on the road to school?). And who on earth at the Disney studio thought that it might be 'edgy' when Pinocchio escapes from his evil grasp for the Coachman (Luke Evans) to exclaim loudly and unmistakeably a word that is a notable expletive, especially in the UK, and which horrified the parents of children whom they'd allowed to view this movie in the not-unreasonable expectation that it would be as wholesome as its enchanting predecessor? (Just to confirm that my ears weren't playing tricks on me regarding the swear word in question, click here to read a major UK newspaper article about it.) As a Welshman, Luke would certainly have been able to inform the American film makers of its less than salubrious British connotation, so surely there can be no excuse for their including it?

Tom Hanks's Geppetto is a masterclass in over-acting, Stromboli the malevolent puppeteer (Giuseppe Battiston) is much weaker here in Pinocchio 2022 than was his literally volcanic Pinocchio 1940 counterpart, and the tentacle-wielding Monstro (or Monstrum as he is superfluously renamed here) resembles the outlandish outcome of a bizarre coupling between a sperm whale and the kraken. Some of Pinocchio 1940's most delightful songs ('Little Woodenhead' and especially 'Give a Little Whistle') are replaced by a vastly inferior copycat composition in the former case, and in the latter case by the interminable exposition of the redesigned multi-winged Blue Fairy (Cynthia Erivo).

Three new characters are also introduced – a friendly young puppeteer named Fabiana (Kyanne Lamaya), her girl puppet Sabina (Jaquita Ta'le), and seagull Sofia (Lorraine Bracco). Sofia obligingly transports Jiminy Cricket (Joseph Gordon-Levitt) in times of need, just like a huge dove transported Pinocchio in Collodi's novel, and the presence of Fabiana enables a catchy yet infuriatingly brief new song to be included. Otherwise, however, their impact is minimal. Also: performing on stage in Pinocchio 1940 the song 'I Got No Strings', when Pinocchio sings its final line 'I got no strings on me' he finds himself with delightfully humorous irony hopelessly entangled in the strings of all the stringed dancing puppets on stage with him, but no such entanglement occurs when he sings that same line on stage in Pinocchio 2022, thereby rendering the whole purpose of that line, and song, worthless.

Speaking of Jiminy, he still serves satisfactorily here as Pinocchio's Blue Fairy-appointed Conscience (albeit a little less prominently than in Pinocchio 1940). And the slick spiel and patter of the sly fox Honest John (Keegan-Michael Key) is just as entertaining (if not even more so) this time round, working in some hilarious 21st-Century psycho-babble references, plus a very funny, expertly-delivered line that Chris Pine would never work as a stage name for Pinocchio – wonderful! Interestingly, just as in Del Toro's movie, there is a poignant back-story here of how Geppetto once had a real son who died young. And the CGI animation is absolutely stunning throughout, as one would expect from any such Disney movie.

But overall, and despite being already familiar to viewers who have seen Pinocchio 1940, the plot as presented here in Pinocchio 2022 doesn't gel at all. This is due in particular to what I perceive to be two major flaws with it.

Firstly: Pinocchio is not being actively tempted by characters and events here, but is instead merely being passively, innocently, led on by them, through no active fault of his own. All of this jars fundamentally with the original Collodi novel's storyline, in which Pinocchio is unequivocally wilful, uncaring, and impetuous, and also with the admittedly more toned-down plot in Pinocchio 1940.

Secondly: at the very end of Pinocchio 2022, Pinocchio's turning into a real boy is not even readily seen to occur – it actually DOES occur, but only in the briefest of blink-and-you'll-miss-it moments – instead of being the immensely moving, joyful, inspirational, crowning scene of the entire movie that it was in Pinocchio 1940 and should have been in this film too. Consequently, instead of ending on a massively uplifting high, it closes with a thoroughly uninspiring, deflated anticlimax. As a result, it made me wonder what the purpose was of the Blue Fairy's loquacious litany at the movie's beginning about what it will take for Pinocchio to become a real boy, and, in turn, what the purpose was of this entire movie, for that matter, because the fundamental raison d'être of Collodi's Pinocchio story was how a wooden puppet boy could become a real flesh-and-blood boy.

But perhaps I'm being too hard on Pinocchio 2022. Perhaps its doom is that it is forever fated to be directly compared to its exceptionally illustrious Disney predecessor, and what animated feature, of any kind, by any studio, stands any chance of shining amid the radiant perfection of Pinocchio 1940? Perhaps Pinocchio 2022 might simply have been judged on its own standalone merits and demerits had it not been irrevocably linked to the infinitely superior Pinocchio 1940. Nevertheless, it IS linked, so I personally dread to think what Walt Disney would have made of Pinocchio 2022 – although if he'd been here, I feel sure that it wouldn't have been made. End of story. However, you may think differently, so why not click here and here in order to watch two different official trailers for this movie and make up your own mind concerning it?

To view a complete chronological listing of all of my Shuker In MovieLand blog's other film reviews and articles (each one instantly accessible via a direct clickable link), please click HERE, and please click HERE to view a complete fully-clickable alphabetical listing of them.

Wednesday, February 9, 2022

RUDYARD KIPLING'S THE JUNGLE BOOK (aka ADVENTURES OF MOWGLI)

My official UK DVD of Rudyard Kipling's The Jungle Book (aka Adventures of Mowgli (© Roman Davydov/Cyrillic Film in Association with Films by Jove and Soyuzmultifilm Studio/LaserLight DVD – reproduced here on a strictly non-commercial Fair Use basis for educational/review purposes only)

My movie watch on 3 February 2022 was an animated movie that I'd wanted to see for a long time. So after buying its DVD earlier that same day for just 25p, I lost no time in doing precisely that. It was the 1996 English dub of Russia's classic version of The Jungle Book, based upon Kipling's much-loved novel from 1894, and has been variously released as Rudyard Kipling's The Jungle Book (as with my DVD) and Adventures of Mowgli (the direct English translation of its original Russian title).

Directed by Roman Davydov, and released by Soyuzmultifilm, this film began as five 20-min cartoons released between 1967 and 1971 (respectively entitled in translated form 'Raksha', 'The Kidnapping', 'Akela's Last Hunt', 'The Fight', and 'Return To Mankind'). However, in 1996 they were combined together in modified form to yield a feature-length movie dubbed into English and narrated by Charlton Heston. The same has also been done to yield a full-length version in Russian, but with much less modification involved (see later). This movie has become so famous and well-loved in Russia that in 2012 it was even commemorated on Russian postage stamps.

The English dub features a number of famous voice actors and actresses taking over the roles of the characters from their original Russian counterparts. Thus Sam Elliott voices Kaa the python, Campbell Lane is Baloo, Scott McNeill is Shere Khan, David Kaye as Akela (also the voice of both Megatron and Optimus Prime in various Transformers series and movies respectively), and Dana Delany as Bagheera (more regarding this ostensibly unusual last-mentioned casting later).

Although the standard of animation doesn't begin to compare with that of the superlative 1967 Disney version, it has its own charm, especially the fluid grace of Bagheera and the beautiful jungle scenery. Moreover, whereas the Disney movie plays fast and loose with Kipling's story, and goes all out for laughs, the Russian version is rather more serious in tone and sticks much closer to its source material (as is true of many Russian film adaptations of famous literary works).

Thus it features scenes such as the battle with the red dogs (dholes), Kaa's friendship with and rescue of Mowgli from the monkeys in the ruined city, the etiolated white cobra guarding the treasure beneath the city, the inclusion of lesser characters such as Tabaqui the jackal and Cheel the kite, and Mowgli's slaying of Shere Khan (as occurs in Kipling's novel, rather than his merely banishing of him as occurs in Disney's 1967 animated version). (Incidentally, you may not know it, but Disney has actually released no fewer than five different versions of The Jungle Book – the 1967 classic animated feature film, three live-action features, and the 2016 combined CGI/live-action feature.)

 
A Russian postage stamp released in 2012 that commemorates Rudyard Kipling's The Jungle Book aka Adventures of Mowgli (public domain)

One startling difference, however, between this movie and Kipling's novel (as well as most other movie adaptations of it), and which initially seemed to me to be both mystifying and unwarranted, is that Bagheera is rendered female (and voiced as noted above by Dana Delaney in the English version) – but then I discovered why. It turns out that in Russian, the noun for panther is feminine! (So too is its noun for fox, which is why the vulpine villain in Russia's classic animated version of Pinocchio is a vixen, not the dog fox that it is both in Carlo Collodi's original novel and in Disney's famous animated movie – the character is named J. Worthington Foulfellow aka Honest John in the latter.)

Also worth noting is that I'd previously viewed the original 5-part Russian original version of this movie, and there are some interesting differences between it and the combined 1996 English dub that I have now watched and own. These primarily consist of the deletion of various scenes of aggression, such as one in which Bagheera takes Mowgli over her knee and smacks him, another in which he cuts off the tail of one of the red dogs, and the blood-red mist scene during which he slays Shere Khan.

Plus there is no narration in the original Russian version, and there are many changes to the music content between the Russian and the English versions. The full-length, joined-up Russian version retains from the five original Russian parts these original scenes and music that have been deleted from the English equivalent.

All in all, Rudyard Kipling's The Jungle Book is a very different but no less satisfying, enjoyable take on Kipling's classic novel from that of Disney, and which I thoroughly recommend to all animation aficionados.

And if you'd like to see for yourself, please click here to view an excerpt from Rudyard Kipling's The Jungle Book on YouTube, plus here if you'd like to view free of charge and in its entirety the original Russian version in joined-up format currently on YouTube.

To view a complete chronological listing of all of my Shuker In MovieLand blog's other film reviews and articles (each one instantly accessible via a direct clickable link), please click HERE, and please click HERE to view a complete fully-clickable alphabetical listing of them.

 
The official DVD of the joined-up, full-length Russian original of this movie, whose title translates as Adventures of Mowgli (© Roman Davydov/Cyrillic Film in Association with Films by Jove and Soyuzmultifilm Studio – reproduced here on a strictly non-commercial Fair Use basis for educational/review purposes only)